Is It Possible to Discontinue Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists after Psoriasis Remission?

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are highly effective treatments for psoriasis. These agents provide the opportunity to improve disease activity and achieve clinical remission. Despite its efficacy, long-term use of biologics is associated with high financial costs and possibly life-threatening adverse events. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in discontinuing TNF antagonists in patients with psoriasis who have achieved a positive clinical response. However, there is a paucity of data and clinical guidelines concerning the cessation TNF antagonists in psoriasis treatment. Several factors, including cost, subsequent treatment efficacy, relative risks, and tolerability, should be considered before the decision is made to discontinue TNF antagonists. Well-designed clinical trials are necessary to identify factors that may trigger disease exacerbation after medication discontinuation in order to recognize the potential disadvantages of discontinuing treatment in patients who are previously successfully managed on TNF antagonists.

Severe combined immunodeficiency mouse-psoriatic human skin xenograft model: A modern tool connecting bench to bedside.

Psoriasis is a multifactorial chronic inflammatory disease. Research into the pathogenesis of this disease is hindered by the lack of a proper animal model. Over the past two decades, many scientists were involved in the development of animal models that nearly mirror the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. One such model, which has opened doors to the study of molecular complexities of psoriasis as well as its treatment, is the severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mouse-human skin chimera model. This model not only mirrors the clinical and histopathological features of psoriasis but also help in the study of cell proliferation, angiogenesis, function of T cells, neurogenic inflammation and cytokines involved in inflammatory reactions. In this article, we have reviewed the prospects and the limitations of the SCID mouse model of psoriasis.

Diagnostic capacity and antimalarial availability in Papua New Guinea before the introduction of a revised national malaria treatment protocol

@#BACKGROUND: Papua New Guinea (PNG) introduced a revised national malaria treatment protocol (NMTP) in late 2011. Successful implementation of the revised protocol requires all health facilities in PNG to have reliable access to microscopy or malaria rapid diagnostic kits as well as a reliable supply of all recommended first-line medications. This paper presents findings from a study that sought to assess the availability of microscopy, malaria rapid diagnostic kits and recommended first-line antimalarial medication in Papua New Guinean health facilities across the country before the introduction of the revised treatment protocol. METHODS: A country-wide cross-sectional survey of 79 randomly selected health centres, health subcentres and aid posts. Data were collected via an interviewer-administered questionnaire completed with the officer in charge of participating health facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 15% of surveyed health facilities had unexpired rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in stock or working microscopy available. A recommended first-line antimalarial for uncomplicated malaria was available in 85% of health facilities. The preferred first-line antimalarial combination for treating severe malaria was present in 42% of health facilities, although 68% had the capacity to provide either the preferred or recommended substitute first-line medication for severe malaria. The total number of health workers employed in the 79 surveyed health facilities was 443, only 3 of whom were medical doctors. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that diagnostic capacity was low in Papua New Guinean health facilities before the introduction of the new NMTP and that access to recommended first-line antimalarial medication was variable. Substantial improvements in diagnostic capacity and antimalarial procurement and distribution will need to be made if the revised protocol is to be adhered to.

Golimumab and certolizumab: The two new anti-tumor necrosis factor kids on the block.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents have revolutionized treatment of psoriasis and many other inflammatory diseases of autoimmune origin. They have considerable advantages over the existing immunomodulators. Anti-TNF agents are designed to target a very specific component of the immune-mediated inflammatory cascades. Thus, they have lower risks of systemic side-effects. In a brief period of 10 years, a growing number of biological therapies are entering the clinical arena while many more biologicals remain on the horizon. With time, the long-term side-effects and efficacies of these individual agents will become clearer and help to determine which ones are the most suitable for long-term care. Golimumab (a human monoclonal anti-TNF-α antibody) and Certolizumab (a PEGylated Fab fragment of humanized monoclonal TNF-α antibody) are the two latest additions to the anti-TNF regimen. Here, we are providing a brief description about these two drugs and their uses.